Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2017-08-10 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a score of 77.4, which is a little bit better than HTC U Ultra's overall score of 77. Although the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition and HTC U Ultra were released with only a few months difference, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little more vivid screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a little bit higher screen pixels density. The HTC U Ultra counts with as much storage to store more apps and games as the Moto Z2 Force Edition, they have the same internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a higher number of cores. HTC U Ultra features a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a 12 mega pixels, the HTC U Ultra also has a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light situations and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs.
HTC U Ultra has just a bit better battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 10 percent greater battery size.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it is a little more expensive than the HTC U Ultra, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC U Ultra. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the HTC U Ultra, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.