Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-08-10 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ has a global score of 81, which is just a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. The LG G7 ThinQ is a newer phone than Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it is a lot thicker and heavier. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a little larger display, a just a little more pixels per display inch and a quite better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
LG G7 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z2 Force Edition. They have a 4 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture, faster video frame rates and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
LG G7 ThinQ features as much storage to install games and applications as Moto Z2 Force Edition, both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal internal memory capacity. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2730mAh.
LG G7 ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.