Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has a global score of 84.3, which is just a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. The LG G8 ThinQ design is newer, but somewhat heavier and much thicker than Moto Z2 Force Edition. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G8 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG G8 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a little larger display and a just a little higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen. LG G8 ThinQ features a greater memory for apps and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG G8 ThinQ also has more internal memory capacity.
LG G8 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same resolution camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a way bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, better video frame rate and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
The LG G8 ThinQ has superior battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 28% greater battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG G8 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.