Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-08-10 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is slightly better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting an 82.5 score against 77.4. LG V30S ThinQ's construction is somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier than Moto Z2 Force Edition. LG V30S ThinQ features a display that's just as good as the Moto Z2 Force Edition one, although the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2880, a little better pixel quantity in each display inch and a little bit bigger display.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more internal storage. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
LG V30S ThinQ has superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 21 percent greater battery size.
The LG V30S ThinQ costs more than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.