Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2017-08-10 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's global score of 77.4. The LG V35 ThinQ design is newer, but just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than Moto Z2 Force Edition. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a slightly higher 1440 x 2880 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch of display.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. The Moto Z2 Force Edition and the LG V35 ThinQ have extremely similar memory for games and applications, both have a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and equal internal storage.
LG V35 ThinQ takes slightly better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a much higher 16 megapixels resolution back camera and a bigger camera aperture.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 21 percent greater battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.