Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting an 81.2 score against 77.4. Even though LG V40 ThinQ is newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's incredibly thicker and heavier. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a bit higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, a bit more pixels per display inch and a larger screen.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures, a way bigger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
The LG V40 ThinQ and Moto Z2 Force Edition count with really similar memory for apps and games, both have the same 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ features superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.