Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. The LG Velvet construction is notably newer, but noticeably thicker and a lot heavier than Moto Z2 Force Edition. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixels amount per inch of display.
The LG Velvet features a better memory to store more games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 64 GB more internal memory. The LG Velvet and Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition both feature similar CPUs, and although the LG Velvet has a larger amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG Velvet takes much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a larger aperture, a way larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
LG Velvet counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 58 percent greater battery size.
LG Velvet is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.