Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a global score of 91.2 against 77.4. Although the LG Wing is notably newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is way thicker and a lot heavier. LG Wing has a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little more vivid screen than LG Wing, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher amount of pixels per inch of display. LG Wing captures much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also has a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
LG Wing counts with a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal storage. LG Wing counts with a very superior battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 47% larger battery capacity.
LG Wing costs more than Moto Z2 Force Edition, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.