Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a global score of 85.3, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 score. Although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is much heavier than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's a bit thinner and also extremely newer. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a bit more vivid display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a much worse amount of pixels in each display inch, it also counts with a lot bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1892 x 2688.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features just a bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4449mAh battery size. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video resolution and a 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a larger diafragm aperture and higher video frame rate.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.