Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a score of 86.3 against 77.4. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a lot newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's noticeably thicker and heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little sharper screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much more megapixels camera in the back, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.