Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a general score of 87.1 against 77.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is newer, but notably thicker and much heavier than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a much lower pixels density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and videos and better video frame rate.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.