Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2017-08-10 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 800.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a global score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 overall score. Motorola One 5G Ace's design is extremely newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it's incredibly heavier and incredibly thicker. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit better display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch of display.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola One 5G Ace shoots much better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a larger aperture for better low-light photography and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Motorola One 5G Ace features a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2730mAh.
The Motorola One 5G Ace is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.