Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 800.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is a little bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a score of 78.5 against 77.4. The Motorola One Action construction is extremely newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it's heavier and thicker. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better display density and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit faster processor than Motorola One Action. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Moto Z2 Force Edition and the Motorola One Action feature extremely similar cameras, and although the Motorola One Action has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and a back camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola One Action features a little bit better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola One Action features longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 28 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Motorola One Action is also by far the cheapest, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.