Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has an overall score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. Motorola One Vision's construction is newer, but much heavier and thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a quite higher pixel density. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One Vision, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One Vision counts with longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh. The Motorola One Vision captures much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Vision also has a way larger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality, a camera in the back with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.