Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a global score of 80 against 77.4. Motorola One Zoom's construction is incredibly newer, but noticeably thicker and a lot heavier than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little faster processor than Motorola One Zoom. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola One Zoom shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also has a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture for better low-light photography and video and a much higher resolution camera.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola One Zoom is also a lot cheaper, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.