Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 overall score. Even though Motorola razr (2020) is a lot newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's a lot heavier and much thicker. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit faster processor than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a brighter display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher pixel amount in each inch in the display. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola razr (2020) captures much better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much better 48 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a little better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3% more battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) costs a lot more than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.