Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a score of 80.3, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's global score of 77.4. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's design is noticeably newer, but extremely heavier and way thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a little better processing power than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly better looking screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel quantity per inch in the display. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes way better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a back facing camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution, a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs, higher video frame rate and a larger aperture.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a really longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Nokia 8 V 5G UW is also cheap compared to the Moto Z2 Force Edition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.