Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Force Edition is just a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView, having a score of 77.4 against 76.4. Moto Z2 Force Edition's body is extremely thinner and somewhat lighter than Nokia 9 PureView, despite of the fact that it was released around 19 months before. Nokia 9 PureView has a bit superior CPU than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Nokia 9 PureView features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a bit greater pixel density, a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a little larger screen. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Nokia 9 PureView has greater battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3320mAh battery size. The Nokia 9 PureView takes a little bit better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and a 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a bigger sensor shooting better quality photographs and videos and a bigger camera aperture for better photography in low-light situations.
Although Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs a little more than the Nokia 9 PureView, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Nokia 9 PureView. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Nokia 9 PureView, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.