Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has an overall score of 80.8, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. The Nokia XR20 construction is noticeably newer, but noticeably heavier and noticeably thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a slightly better looking screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit better processing power than Nokia XR20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with slightly more storage capacity to install games and applications than Nokia XR20, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 70 percent more battery capacity. The Nokia XR20 captures better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has a way bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, higher video frame rates, a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a bigger aperture for better captures in low light situations.
The Nokia XR20 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.