Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a 77.4 score against 75.8. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's construction is much lighter and much thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, although it was released 2 years before. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater display density.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes way better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a much bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality, a bigger aperture for better low light captures and video, a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a much higher video resolution.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a quite bigger memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs more money than the nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as nubia Red Magic 3S. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Moto Z2 Force Edition, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the nubia Red Magic 3S, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.