Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Force Edition is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a general score of 77.4 against 76.2. Moto Z2 Force Edition's construction is way lighter and notably thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a slightly better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixel density.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S has just a little better processing power than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65 percent bigger battery size. Nubia Red Magic 5S takes greater photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a way larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images.
Although Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs more than nubia Red Magic 5S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as nubia Red Magic 5S. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, else you can save some dollars and buy the nubia Red Magic 5S, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.