Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a global score of 79.9 against 77.4. Galaxy A25 5G's body is notably newer, but much thicker and way heavier than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A25 5G has a bit better looking display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a lot worse display pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a camera with a much higher resolution and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a really longer battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has an 83% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.