Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30s has a general score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy A30s is a much newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's somewhat heavier and a lot thicker. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A30s. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A30s has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A30s also has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
The Samsung Galaxy A30s has a way better battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.