Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's overall score of 77.4. Although Samsung Galaxy A31 is notably newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's noticeably thicker and extremely heavier. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A31. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixel count in each screen inch. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A31 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A31 also has a much more megapixels back camera and a much larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.