Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is slightly better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a 79.4 score against 77.4. Galaxy A35 5G's design is way newer, but noticeably thicker and way heavier than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per display inch.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a larger camera aperture, a camera with much more mega-pixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.