Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A40 is a little bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a global score of 79.6 against 77.4. Although Samsung Galaxy A40 is extremely thicker than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's just a bit lighter and also newer. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels number in each inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A40. They have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cores. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega pixels resolution, a tinier back-facing camera sensor and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A40, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A40 has just a bit longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3100mAh battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.