Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 is a little bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a overall score of 81.7 against 77.4. Galaxy A41's design is much newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is extremely thicker and just a bit heavier. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A41. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A41, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a quite better pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A41 has a much better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has a way bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A41, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A41 features better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 28 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.