Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a score of 83.8 against 77.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy A50 is newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's way thicker and somewhat heavier. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A50. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A50 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also has a larger sensor, a larger camera aperture and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 25 mega pixels resolution.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A50 features a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A50 is also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.