Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a general score of 86.6 against 77.4. Galaxy A50s's body is way newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is heavier and thicker. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better screen pixel density.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features slightly more memory for applications and games than Galaxy A50s, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a processor that's very similar to Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a way better battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh. Galaxy A50s features a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same aperture, the Galaxy A50s also has a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.