Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is much better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 overall score. Galaxy A51 is a way newer phone than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it is way thicker and heavier. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A51. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The Galaxy A51 counts with a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A51 also has a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a much larger camera sensor.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A51, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A51 features a superior battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.