Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's global score of 77.4. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a incredibly newer phone than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's noticeably thicker and noticeably heavier. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Galaxy A51 5G features a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a SD card slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2730mAh. Galaxy A51 5G features a greater camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a lot better resolution back camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy A51 5G is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.