Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-10 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a 90.7 score against 77.4. Galaxy A52's body is incredibly newer, but noticeably heavier and noticeably thicker than Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A52, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A52 takes much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also has a much more mega pixels back facing camera, a larger aperture for better low light photos and video and a much bigger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy A52 counts with a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.