Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a 91.3 score against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G body is incredibly newer, but extremely heavier and thicker than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger aperture to take better low-light photos, a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy A52 5G has a really longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.