Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. Samsung Galaxy A52s's construction is notably newer, but a lot thicker and much heavier than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Galaxy A52s's processing unit is just as good as the Moto Z2 Force Edition one, and although the Galaxy A52s has more RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Galaxy A52s counts with a little bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s captures much better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a back facing camera with a way better resolution, a larger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations and a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.