Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-10 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a global score of 77.4, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A6's score of 75.8. Moto Z2 Force Edition is an older cellphone than the Galaxy A6, but Motorola was able to build it somewhat lighter and way thinner anyway. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A6, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much higher screen pixel density.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A6 features a little better battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a way less mega pixels camera, a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography and video and a tinier back camera sensor providing a lower image quality, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.