Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Force Edition is a bit better than Galaxy A70, getting a score of 77.4 against 76.9. Even though Moto Z2 Force Edition is older than the Galaxy A70, it's body is notably lighter and much thinner. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A70, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited situations and a tinier sensor shooting lower quality photos, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65% larger battery size.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A70. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy A70, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.