Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has a score of 87.5, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 general score. Galaxy A71's body is newer, but extremely heavier and thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A71 takes a lot better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 also has a camera in the back with a way better resolution, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A71 has a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.