Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a global score of 92.9 against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a notably newer phone than Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it's noticeably heavier and much thicker. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots way better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations, a lot higher 64 MP resolution camera and a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.