Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. Galaxy F41's body is notably newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is way thicker and way heavier. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy F41, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F41's processor is just as good as Moto Z2 Force Edition's CPU, and although the Samsung Galaxy F41 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy F41, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy F41 has a lot better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F41 also has a way bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality pictures and videos, a much more mega pixels camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.