Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's global score of 77.4. Although Galaxy F62 is noticeably newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's heavier and incredibly thicker. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (although slower).
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy F62 captures way better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy F62 also has a much more megapixels back facing camera, a way larger back camera sensor and a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy F62 has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 156% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.