Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a overall score of 97.6 against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is extremely newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is somewhat thicker and much heavier. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Fold shoots clearer videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a 12 mega pixels resolution camera, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger back camera sensor, faster video frame rates and a much bigger aperture.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Fold features a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 60% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.