Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has a general score of 78.9, which is slightly better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 score. Although the Galaxy M20 is newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's extremely heavier and noticeably thicker. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little better processing power than Galaxy M20. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy M20 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a slightly better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a camera in the back with less mega-pixels and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a larger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.