Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 score. Samsung Galaxy M51's construction is noticeably newer, but notably heavier and noticeably thicker than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy M51, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy M51 has a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy M51 also has a lot larger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a bigger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 156 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.