Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's overall score of 77.4. Galaxy Note 20's body is notably newer, but way heavier and thicker than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 shoots much better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a lot higher video definition and a larger aperture.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 20 has a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 costs more money than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.