Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a general score of 98.9 against 77.4. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is noticeably newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it's a lot heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little lower amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a larger screen. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a lot bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a lot better video resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and a way higher resolution camera.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.