Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.72 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 score. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an a lot older, somewhat heavier and extremely thicker device than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit better processor than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
Galaxy Note 3 has just a bit better looking display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has much less pixels per inch in the display and a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note 3 features greater battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 17 percent greater battery capacity. Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photos and a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a higher resolution camera.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy Note 3 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.