Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-10 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. Even being the best we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a somewhat heavier and a lot thicker device than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a just a bit higher amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 17 percent greater battery size. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's camera is just as good as the Moto Z2 Force Edition one, and although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos, they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a camera with a 12 MP resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.