Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a global score of 86.2 against 77.4. Galaxy Note10 Lite's design is newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it's noticeably thicker and heavier. Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite shoots clearer photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments, better 60 fps video frame rate and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.