Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 has an overall score of 77.7, which is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's global score of 77.4. Even being the best in this comparison review, we must tell that it's also an a lot older, way thicker and somewhat heavier phone. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy Note3, because it has more RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition and Galaxy Note3 count with quite similar cameras, because although the Galaxy Note3 has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos and a tinier sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a camera with more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 features greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 17 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.