Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-10 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note4 has an overall score of 77.6, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. The Galaxy Note4 body is much older, notably thicker and heavier than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note4 counts with longer battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has an 18 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy Note4 has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy Note4 also counts with a much higher resolution back camera and a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.